Best AI Chatbots of 2026
The idea of AI now extends far beyond ChatGPT. With Google, Anthropic and Microsoft in the mix, there’s never been a more robust selection of chatbots and other AI tools to work with, helping people work, learn, and create.
Claude is such a capable chatbot that it’s hard to compare it to others at times, despite the competition having at least some similar capabilities. Claude’s Connectors and Skills allow you to extend and customize its functionality to your liking without a major learning curve.
Pros
- Detailed and insightful answers
- Fast response time
- Typically consistent across the board
Cons
- Claude’s best features are behind a paywall
- No image or video generator
Google unquestionably wins in the overall value of what it offers with its subscription tiers. Even in its lowest Plus plan, regularly $8/month, you’re treated to 200GB of cloud storage, and it only goes up from there. Not to mention you can share that storage with up to five people. If you’re looking for more than just access to better AI models, then Google’s plans are a no-brainer.
Pros
- Upgrading Gemini gives you a lot more than better models
- Nano Banana Pro image generator is the best of its kind
- Integrates seamlessly into other Google products
Cons
- You’re giving even more of your data to Google
- Significant guardrails around certain conversation topics
Most chatbots are great at one thing (if they’re lucky), good at a couple of things and just “okay” at the rest. ChatGPT is good at most things, though it might not be particularly great at all things. It’s also still wildly popular, and that fan base is seemingly here to stay.
Pros
- Provides solid answers with ample context
- Good at general-purpose outputs
Cons
- Despite its popularity, ChatGPT is less impressive next to the competition these days
- Lacks a “killer feature”
- Ads on free plan and low-cost Go plan
Most of the things we praised Perplexity for a couple of years ago are now practically default with many chatbots, like showing sources to information. It still breaks all of the sources down, right next to the point it makes, making it easy to discern which claim came from where. Perplexity is great at helping you compare products and organize a trip or other plans, but some of its best features are locked behind a premium subscription.
Pros
- Great for deep dives and comparisons
- Dedicated tabs for sources, images and more mentioned
- Choice of multiple models to work with (paid)
Cons
- Still cites YouTube and Reddit as sources by default too often
- Not immune to hallucinations, despite providing sources.
PHOTO EDITING SOFTWARE DEALS OF THE WEEK
Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.
The generative AI chatbot landscape has changed dramatically since ChatGPT blew the lid off the sector in 2022, and there are more options to choose from than ever before. However, in such a sea of options, not all perform nearly as well as others at certain tasks, and some still lag far behind the big names.
So what makes a good chatbot? Is it the nuance of its answers or how well it can perform coding tasks? Maybe it’s how well it can take your text prompts and generate images and videos? In reality, it’s all of these things, but what matters most is up to you. Still, there are some obvious standouts that deserve to be highlighted.
Below, we’ll highlight the chatbots we believe are among the best after testing, each bringing something unique to the table.
What is the best AI chatbot of 2026 so far?
Claude by Anthropic takes the cake for best overall chatbot. While it’s often considered to be more work-focused than general-purpose, its consistency is what wins out overall. The landscape has changed with the competition, and while the likes of Gemini and ChatGPT have improved by leaps and bounds, so has Claude.
Best overall AI chatbot
Pros
- Detailed and insightful answers
- Fast response time
- Typically consistent across the board
Cons
- Claude’s best features are behind a paywall
- No image or video generator
Claude is such a capable chatbot that it’s hard to compare it to others at times, despite the competition having at least some similar capabilities. Claude’s Connectors and Skills allow you to extend and customize its functionality to your liking without a major learning curve.
Claude isn’t perfect, though. For example, when vibe coding, Claude can automatically assess and attempt to fix errors if something isn’t working with your project. But like other chatbots, Claude sometimes fails to fix the messes it makes on your project. It’s not that it’s particularly worse at fixing errors compared to the competition, but having a dedicated feature to address coding errors, only for it to fail fairly often, makes the failure feel more glaring. One thing to note is that Claude, even on the free plan, is incredibly fast at generating code, error-filled or otherwise.
To get the best models available for Claude, you’ll need to pay $20/month. This isn’t unique among the chatbots on this list, but qualms or hiccups you find in the free versions may be mitigated or eliminated with a more advanced model.
Pros
- Upgrading Gemini gives you a lot more than better models
- Nano Banana Pro image generator is the best of its kind
- Integrates seamlessly into other Google products
Cons
- You’re giving even more of your data to Google
- Significant guardrails around certain conversation topics
Google unquestionably wins in the overall value of what it offers with its subscription tiers. Even in its lowest Plus plan, regularly $8/month, you’re treated to 200GB of cloud storage, and it only goes up from there. Not to mention you can share that storage with up to five people. If you’re looking for more than just access to better AI models, then Google’s plans are a no-brainer.
Having a free Google account will still net you some extra features. The same free 15 GB of storage for Gmail, Drive and Photos is still there, but a free Google account will give you access to Gemini 3 Flash, limited access to Gemini 3 Pro, image generation via Nano Banana and daily credits for additional AI tools such as Flow and Whisk.
But let’s rewind. In the beginning, when it was known as Bard, Gemini was a bit of a mess. Initially quick to hallucinate and suggest less-than-ideal advice, Google’s AI has improved significantly, easily rivaling both Claude and ChatGPT. It’s great at vibe coding and shopping. Since this is Google, Gemini is stuffed into just about every other product the search giant provides, too.
Gemini also has another crown to wear on its head, and that’s image generation. Thanks to Nano Banana, Gemini went from decent at images to the best, seemingly overnight.
Despite its incredibly rocky start, Gemini continues to hit the sweet spots.
Pros
- Provides solid answers with ample context
- Good at general-purpose outputs
Cons
- Despite its popularity, ChatGPT is less impressive next to the competition these days
- Lacks a “killer feature”
- Ads on free plan and low-cost Go plan
Most chatbots are great at one thing (if they’re lucky), good at a couple of things and just “okay” at the rest. ChatGPT is good at most things, though it might not be particularly great at all things. It’s also still wildly popular, and that fan base is seemingly here to stay.
One of ChatGPT’s highlights is writing, where it can adapt to the instructed tone easily. Whether you’re drafting a text, email or legal document, it’s rare for ChatGPT’s output to be a miss in this arena, at least when it comes to tone. (As always, check the accuracy of anything you generate with AI.) Photos are also decent, even when compared to Nano Banana Pro at times, though the latter holds the crown for a reason.
ChatGPT doesn’t have to be the best to have a loyal fanbase. It’s improved significantly since its early days, and while it has incredibly stiff competition that bests it in a few ways, the first-mover advantage is still working for it.
Pros
- Great for deep dives and comparisons
- Dedicated tabs for sources, images and more mentioned
- Choice of multiple models to work with (paid)
Cons
- Still cites YouTube and Reddit as sources by default too often
- Not immune to hallucinations, despite providing sources.
Most of the things we praised Perplexity for a couple of years ago are now practically default with many chatbots, like showing sources to information. It still breaks all of the sources down, right next to the point it makes, making it easy to discern which claim came from where. Perplexity is great at helping you compare products and organize a trip or other plans, but some of its best features are locked behind a premium subscription.
One of our previous complaints with Perplexity was that it relies too heavily on Reddit posts at times. Without any tweaking, this is still true, and it can throw YouTube into the mix, too. These can be valuable resources, but they won’t win you any brownie points on a school paper. Luckily, Perplexity now lets you filter the type of sources you receive by typing “@” and choosing from web, academic, social and more.
Paid subscribers can quickly switch between AI models for even deeper dives and different perspectives.
Testing chatbots is an imperfect task. AI models are constantly changing, and the way to test them varies with each iteration. Indeed, even the way you deliver your query could very well affect how the chatbot responds on the same model. With this in mind, the way we approach testing chatbots is to ask questions that an average person may want to ask. Whether it’s asking AI to come up with a recipe based on the ingredients in your kitchen, a product comparison or some of the best TV shows to watch based on your personal interests, these types of prompts aren’t an attempt to confuse the chatbot or get it to hallucinate.
While we typically don’t ask chatbots about current events, we do ask questions to see how far each option is willing to speak to the subject, as some are more open to conversing about these topics than others.
Ultimately, we’re looking for answers that are thoughtful and nuanced, taking the appropriate context into account to deliver a useful response.
For more, see How We Test AI.
No matter what any privacy policy claims, your sensitive information should stay out of chatbots. AI models need training, and unless you’re checking every privacy policy, your personal details could be swallowed up and potentially regurgitated elsewhere in the worst-case scenario. Some privacy policies, such as Google’s, state that identifiable information is removed, but you should remain cautious about the details you provide to any AI.
Microsoft Copilot: Copilot can be found on the web, Windows computers or the dedicated mobile app, and it uses Chat GPT-4/5 models. It’s about as easy to use as any other chatbot, but users with a Copilot 365 license will see the most benefit in this solution. Image generation, while inconsistent, can be a highlight with this model, sometimes capable of outputting stunning work.
Still, the overall experience Copilot provides isn’t up to snuff with the likes of Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini.
Meta AI: Integrated into several Meta apps and the Ray-Ban Meta glasses, Meta AI is accessed a bit differently than other chatbots. It’s free and can generate text and images, but it struggles to stand out next to the competition. While Meta AI can be decent at a couple of general-purpose tasks like shopping advice and comparisons, there’s ultimately nothing to highlight that a competitor can’t do better.
Chatbots and LLMs are not quite the same thing. The LLM, or large language model, can be thought of as the brain. It’s able to process text, generate code, translate languages and more, but its primary function is not to chat. That’s where the chatbot comes in.
If the LLM is the brain, the chatbot is the body, providing structure to the experience. The chatbot is the app you use to interact with it. That’s not all, though. Chatbots can also have several other features, and most do, including image or video generators, coding and more.
TLDR: About $20 a month, if you want to pay for one.
If you’re a regular user of any chatbot on the free version, you’ll likely meet its limitations eventually. Some of these limitations will lock you out of continuing the conversation after a certain amount of time. And for those looking to upgrade to get higher limits, expect to pay about $20 for most personal subscription versions of each popular chatbot.
More recently, Google introduced an $8 “Plus” AI plan that bridges the gap between the free and the Pro versions. It’s a smart move, given that some people might not want to cough up the initial $20. ChatGPT also offers a lower-cost, “Go” plan, for the same price.
All major chatbots now have apps on both iOS and Android, so it’s essentially a matter of preference. If you’re using an Android phone, then Gemini takes the win, as it’s preinstalled on many phones out of the box and deeply integrates into the system. If you’re rocking a Pixel phone, the best of Gemini is already at your fingertips.
For some iOS users, Apple Intelligence is preinstalled, but it’s far from the idea that Apple initially promised. Eventually, Gemini will be the underlying model that runs the show, but for now, the choice is up to you. For its simple and straightforward approach, we prefer the ChatGPT app.
Despite significant improvements in recent years, the chatbots we’re working with today still make mistakes sometimes, and some companies even have checks in place to determine whether images are made with AI or not. It may not be a completely perfect solution, but guardrails are being put in place to protect humans from undetectable AI slop.
No matter what you do, be sure to keep your sensitive and personal information out of a chat with a chatbot, as the parent companies often can — and sometimes will — use whatever info you give to their AI as they see fit.
Even if the answer ultimately becomes a firm “no,” we’re not there yet. As long as you follow safe practices when interacting with AI, there’s no reason to assume your information is any less secure than it would be if you provided it directly to Google, Meta or OpenAI.
- Claude is AI and can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.
- Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.
- ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
There’s a reason that most chatbots have warning labels at the bottom of the conversations you have with them, and that’s because there’s no guarantee that the information it’s providing you is accurate. While chatbots have become better at providing sources, you’ll never know if what’s being fed to you is true unless you read the source.
Chatbots have become smarter and more accurate, but they can still hallucinate, meaning you can’t always trust what they say to you. No matter how advanced they get, you should always double check their answers.
